We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

How Successfully did Elizabeth I Handle Her Finances? Essay Sample

  • Pages: 4
  • Word count: 963
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: elizabeth

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

In her reign, Elizabeth I had successes and failures throughout when it comes to looking at finance. When Elizabeth had come to the throne, she had been left a debt by her predecessor, Mary I, of 300,000. With tight control over expenditure and many other factors, by 1585 the debt had been converted to a cash reserve of 300,000. However, there were problems that Elizabeth encountered during her reign to do with finance, and it is both sides I will be looking at in this essay.

The first factor to show that Elizabeth dealed with her finances successfully was the selling of crown lands. Elizabeth sold crown lands she felt were surplus because this would help contribute toward building the cash reserve she achieved in 1585. This brought in 600,000 throughout her reign. She also raised revenue by allowing the last of the monastic properties seized by Henry VIII pass into private ownership. This then meant that Elizabeth would collect money for this to because in many ways, these properties were of no use to Elizabeth so there was no harm in selling them for a profit.

Elizabeth also participated in joint stock trading companies. This would help raise revenue by anything that was traded for a profit. An important figure that helped Elizabeth towards the end of her reign to make money was Francis Drake. Often described as a pirate, Drake on a few occasions was sent to Spain to attack ships and bring to England any sources of profit they might have. In 1592, the capture of the bullion ship Madre de Dois in the East Indies meant a return of �80,000. A way in which Elizabeth increased sources of revenue domestically was that she collected debts more vigorously than before. Although this was against her will, this was just another way in which Elizabeth could raise revenue.

A counter argument for the increasing sources of revenue is that although revenue increased the methods were short term and didn’t keep up with inflation. An important method that Elizabeth used was monopolies. Monopolies were seen as a cheap form of patronage and Elizabeth u

sed them too often, especially towards the end of her reign. If Elizabeth gave a member of the Privy

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
Council for example, a monopoly, this meant that that particular person could fix the price of a certain commodity and anyone who wanted to buy that item would have to pay that price. However, this caused opposition and in the case of the example I used, could cause factional division in the Privy Council. Any properties the crown owned, the rent was raised to try and increase revenue. However, as was the case for many similar issues, these prices did not keep in line with inflation and therefore were useless to Elizabeth. Also, the selling of crown lands weakened the crowns financial base in the long term.

Another factor to show that Elizabeth handled her finances successfully was that she decreased expenditure. The first way in which Elizabeth did this was that she used unpaid officials in government. These people did not have a fixed salary but instead worked for rewards, such as favourable leases on land and import and export licences. Elizabeth used a similar reward system for courtiers. Elizabeth would give them monopoly rights or wardships which did not involve financial outlay. Elizabeth made sure that anyone who worked for her had a low salary. These did not keep in line with inflation and were inevitably almost useless. Another way that Elizabeth decreased expenditure was that no new buildings were ordered. This meant no new palaces were built and that annual maintenance costs were halved. Lastly, a way in which Elizabeth decreased expenditure in the military was that naval expenses were maintained at a minimum by remodelling old ships rather than building new ones.

A counter argument for the decreasing of expenditure was the methods used to decrease expenditure were often unpopular and caused unrest. An example I used in the previous counter argument that fits here also is monopolies. After 1597, the number granted of these increased dramatically. It was felt that monopolies meant profits for the holder at the expense of the purchaser, because the price of goods such as iron, salt and oil increased. In the last parliaments of her reign, attacks on Elizabeth for granting monopolies were ferocious causing her to back down and promise to investigate and restrict such grants.

Another factor to show that Elizabeth handled her finances successfully was that throughout her reign, Elizabeth collected large subsidies from Parliament. In 1593, Elizabeth asked for three subsidies from Parliament. These were eventually granted after 24 days of debate. In October 1601, Cecil called for �300,000 to be raised. Elizabeth was granted four subsidies by Parliament to cover this. Elizabeth was also granted a quadruple subsidy; this was unprecedented however Elizabeth was still granted this subsidy.

A counter argument against Elizabeth collecting large subsidies was the failure to reform taxation and so allowed corruption. In Elizabeth’s reign there was an increasing demand for parliamentary taxation. In the 1570’s Parliament was asked to approve subsidy taxes, even in peacetime, on the grounds that they were necessary for the country’s defence. The outbreak of war with Spain led to unprecedented demands for taxation, even though Elizabeth’s determination not to run up large debts influenced her military decisions. As parliamentary taxation was not efficiently administered the collectors, known as subsidy commissioners, were often corrupt. Ownership records were often decades out of date, leaving many untaxed. Above all, the assessment of wealth and income was based upon unsworn declarations.

We can write a custom essay on

How Successfully did Elizabeth I Handle Her Financ ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

To what Extent was there a Struggle...

"For Elizabeth, parliamentarians were little boys-sometimes unruly, usually a nuisance, and always a waste of an intelligent woman's time." Elizabeth did not like her Parliaments, illustrated in the quotation. She saw matters of religion and foreign affairs as falling within her prerogative as God's representative on earth and therefore not to be discussed in Parliament, except by invitation.2 This view however is relatively new. The old Orthodox view is that Elizabeth looked upon her Parliaments as a forum where she could maintain contact with her loyal subjects. It is unclear from where this view originated. It may have been from evidence contained in Elizabeth's speeches to Parliament where she appeared to look upon them fondly: "I do assure you there is no prince that loves his subjects better, or whose love can countervail our love." The writings of others, such as Sir John Neale during the 1930s to the 1950s...

What Problems did Elizabeth I face at...

Elizabeth faced several problems at the beginning of her reign in 1558. These were all problems based on either who she was or how she should decide to run the country. There were three main areas in which Elizabeth faced problems where she was forced to make difficult decisions early on in her reign: marriage, religion and foreign politics. However, any decision made would be complex as each problem she faced was not isolated and every choice may cause further crisis. Once Elizabeth became Queen many people worried about the fact that she was unmarried and childless. This would have been a problem because as the last of the Tudor line there would have been great pressure on her to have a child in order for her to continue the Tudor name and for there to be a rightful heir to the throne after her death. Due to the hereditary...

How Influential was Dudley on the Reign...

Although Dudley was certainly a well known figure in the Elizabethan period as a courtier and close friend to the Queen, the extent of his influence in the decision making process of government outside his appointment as 'Master of the Horse', is a matter of some debate and conjecture. Whilst examining this topic it is important to remember that there were times when Dudley was out of favour. His influence therefore was not a constant. Elizabeth also that she had other significant advisors such as Cecil and Walsingham, who both held official, political roles within her Council. They each had periods when their star was on the ascent and others when they seemed to climb very little. Elizabeth deliberately gave and withheld her favour to keep all her advisors anxious to retain it. Robert Dudley was clearly Elizabeth's favourite courtier, known as 'Sweet Robin'�, especially during the early years of...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?