We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The Two Pairs of Lovers in “Much Ado About Nothing” Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 5
  • Word count: 1,228
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: lovers

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

To contrast the two pairs of lovers, I will firstly compare their attitudes before the two couples actually became lovers.

At the beginning of the play we learn that Don Pedro “hath bestowed much honour on a young Florentine” – Claudio, who is then later described as “noble”. From this I understand Claudio is a highly respected and honoured soldier and a good friend to Don Pedro. He is a conventional young hero, for that time, and what better for a young hero to acquire a young, rich, beautiful wife? And is there a better wife than a rich young heiress, daughter to the Governor of a respectable place called Messina?

I do not think Claudio’s intention was necessarily to fall in love, and this idea is supported by the fact that he ‘falls in love’ with one of the first women he lays his eyes upon in Messina. It is supposedly ‘love at first sight’ and although this idea is very romantic, it is a very rare and spurious occurrence. In the subsequent conversation Claudio has with Benedick, he is exceedingly complimentary of Hero and does pronounce to love her, so there is a possibility of this love being genuine, but as I will later disclose, successive actions on Claudio’s part seen to give us evidence that his love is not deep.

We do not really have much idea about Hero’s own objectives and aims, but what is made clear in the play is that she is very much under her father’s influence. We can see this throughout the play, for instance when she is given to Count Claudio to be betrothed. Leonato says, “Count, take of me my daughter, and with her my fortunes: his grace hath made the match”. Leonato talks about Hero as if she is a ‘thing’ in his possession to give to whom he pleases. Not once is Hero asked for her opinion, not once in this section of the scene does she even speak. Of course, this highlights the massive social difference between Elizabethan times and the twenty first century. In the democratic world of today, women usually have just as much say in their marriage and choice of partner as men themselves, though things were very different in the time Shakespeare’s plays were written – Shakespeare merely writes about the society he knows and lives in. Hero has few lines throughout her many appearances, giving me the impression that she is a quiet, acquiescent and obedient young woman, who rarely gives her opinion and lets her fate be decided by her father and the prince and his company.

Hero is also an heiress with a social responsibility, so her fathe

r must feel that a good husband is what society deserves from her, as her husband will come into use

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
of her wealth. We see that Leonato wants for her a good husband, for when he wrongly believes Don Pedro wants to woo and marry Hero, he responds delightedly and slightly unbelievingly

Benedick, however, is an unconventional soldier with no fear whatsoever of enlightening everyone around with his opinion. He makes it extremely clear that his intentions are never to marry, where he says, “for truly I love none” and “I will live a bachelor” He also continuously pokes fun at Claudio and the idea of falling in love. So for someone who is so against marriage, when he falls in love, I reason that surely this is a natural and true love?

Beatrice, as opposed to Hero has no social responsibility, has no father to find her a husband, and is not an heiress, therefore has no real reasons for marriage. She also has the intention to remain single, “I would rather hear a dog bark at a crow than a man swear he loves me”

As for the authenticity of each couple’s love, I think we can safety say that Claudio and Hero’s love is of a counterfeit nature. Three main points in the script show this. Firstly, the fact that as soon as Claudio saw Hero, he wanted to marry her. I think that this shows Claudio was not concerned about getting to know the woman he is to marry before deciding to marry her. Not ten minutes after sighting Hero does he says, “Can the world buy such a jewel and, “I would scarce trusty myself, though I had sworn to the contrary, if Hero would be my wife”. This shows us that despite having sworn (like Benedick) never to marry, and despite Benedick’s continual pessimistic description of Hero, he never wavers in his ‘love’ and goes on to profess, “That I love her, I feel”. In our culture in Britain today, this would be unreasonable and unusual. But this play is set in Elizabethan England, where marriage and love values were completely different. Arranged marriages were common and a man and a woman were frequently married without properly knowing each other first. So from my point of view, with my culture affecting my views, I think that Claudio’s and Hero’s love is very shallow, though it may be genuine.

The second point is that Hero agreed to marry Claudio without so much as speaking to him. Claudio did not woo Hero for even five minutes. Don Pedro wooed Hero for him and she agreed to marry him, as was her father’s will.

The third point is that Claudio obviously does not want to give Hero the benefit of the doubt. He cannot feel much emotional love towards her, because I think trust automatically comes with love. He did not enquire about what had happened, when he thought he saw Hero being unfaithful, just assumed the worst. He publicly shamed her at her wedding, accusing her, saying, “her blush is guiltiness not modesty” and “she knows the heat of a luxurious bed”.

I have considered the view that anyone, no matter how deep and meaningful their love, having seen who they thought was their lover in bed with someone else, are bound to be upset and believe the worst. But the manner in which Claudio acts is rather suspicious of this point. He makes no effort to find out what happened, and I really think that this is because he barely knows Hero and was too hasty in trying to marry her.

It could be argued that Benedick and Beatrice did not naturally fall in love, but were psychologically tricked. However, I think that the trick that Don Pedro, Claudio, Leonato, Hero and Ursula played on the pair just uncovered an attraction that was rooted deep inside each other. It is said that hate is closely related to love, and Benedick and Beatrice on the exterior hate each other but this could just be a cover-up for their true feelings. Benedick and Beatrice, as opposed to the preceding couple I talked about, have known each other for a while. Beatrice, as soon as she hears Benedick is coming to Messina; shows recognition and a dislike of him.

We can write a custom essay on

The Two Pairs of Lovers in “Much Ado About N ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Shakespeare Presents The Two Pairs of Lovers...

'Much Ado About Nothing' would have been pronounced 'Much Ado About Noting' in Shakespeare's time. Noting would infer seeing how things appear on the surface as opposed to how things really are. This provides an immediate clue as to how the play and the presentation of the story of the two pairs of lovers would be received by an audience of the time, living as they did in a patriarchal society which was based on social conventions and appearances. It can also be taken as an initial comment by Shakespeare about that society and its values and moral codes. Modern audiences, however, live in a more sexually egalitarian society. Although appearances are still important, values are more dependent on self-analysis and self-knowledge. It is significant that the story of Hero and Claudio, the first of the pairs of lovers, is one that Elizabethan audiences would have probably been familiar with....

''The Demon Lover'' by Elizabeth Bowen

The Demon Lover and Other Stories by Elizabeth Bowen was first published in Britain in 1945. In 1946, the collection was published in the United States under the title Ivy Gripped the Steps and Other Stories. Without exception, reviewers greeted it enthusiastically, praising it for what was described in the New Yorker as ‘‘a completely successful explanation of what war did to the mind and spirit of the English people.'' Today, ''The Demon Lover'' is probably the most anthologized of Bowen's short stories, and critics claim that it reflects some of Bowen's greatest strengths as a writer. Bowen was inspired to write ‘‘The Demon Lover'' during World War II, after having experienced the Blitz, or aerial bombardment, of London by the Germans during 1940-41. Remembering the effects of World War I, people in London were overwhelmed by the events of World War II. Bowen's story, then, attempted to encapsulate the...

Porphyrias Lover

Like ‘My Last Duchess’, this poem is an example of a dramatic monologue – a poem in which the impression the speaker unwittingly gives is rather different from the picture they intend to present. Initially, the poem appears to be built around a contrast between the storm outside and the cosy domestic scene within the cottage that Porphyria and her lover share. But there are unsettling notes from the very start –the storm is strangely personified in terms of sullenness, ‘spite’ and anger, and the speaker is for some reason so moved by it that his heart is ‘fit to break’ (5), while – on the other hand – when Porphyria arrives, he is entirely passive and all but emotionless. A psychological reading of the poem would suggest that the lover is suppressing his own unbearable feelings of violent jealousy here, and unconsciously projecting them instead – in a pathetic...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?